Sunday 29 May 2011

natalie portman children

natalie portman children. natalie portman children. with
  • natalie portman children. with



  • tjb1
    Apr 12, 12:59 PM
    GF and I just switched. Ive had Tmobile for 11 years and the Iphone but I am sick of edge. Just got done JB and using mywi as we speak, alot faster!

    Watch out, everyone here will bitch at you for using over 1gb of "unlimited" data...





    natalie portman children. Do WB Want Natalie Portman For
  • Do WB Want Natalie Portman For



  • MacRumors
    Oct 28, 02:21 PM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    Apple appears to have pulled the publicly accessible Mac OS 10.4.8 Source Code (Darwin, the open-source foundation of OS X, and XNU, Darwin's open-source kernel), leaving only developers with ADC log-ins with access to the code (public link (http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/), ADC link (http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/tarballs/apsl/))

    Earlier this week, the OSx86 project (http://osx86project.org/) released a version of the 10.4.8 kernel (http://semthex.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2006/10/24/haleluja-it-s-done.html) that was hailed to be 100% legal according to the APSL and run on any x86 machine. Prior to this release, Apple's code would only run on Apple's hardware due to various dependencies (such as EFI).





    natalie portman children. Actors: Natalie Portman
  • Actors: Natalie Portman



  • goobot
    Apr 29, 01:24 PM
    Im very excited to see what they announce at the wwdc.





    natalie portman children. natalie portman children.
  • natalie portman children.



  • skunk
    Apr 21, 12:12 PM
    Exactly.Very inexactly. The Arabs invented 0 some time ago. The system is borked.





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman 1995
  • Natalie Portman 1995



  • jonat8
    Sep 12, 03:47 AM
    Hmm, no iTMS updates here in the UK as of yet. Hopefully that fact and also that the webcast is being broadcast in London as well suggests that the UK might get a piece of the action too :)

    I hope that the Movie Store comes out today but I think that purchase-only will be a bad idea. There has to be the option to BUY and to RENT movies, otherwise I don't think it will succeed given the cheap price of DVDs these days. But having the ability to rent appeals to the impulse buyer who just wants something to watch that night, which is probably me - I would go looking for a new release movie that I want to rent to watch that evening, that's it.

    The other thing that I'm desperately hoping for is cheap prices for older movies. If you go down to the video shop to rent a movie, new releases are £3.50, older releases £2.00 or less. I want to see the same think on the movie store. So if I feel the need to watch "Mrs Doubtfire" again one rainy afternoon, I can rent it instantly for a couple of pounds. Same with purchases - you can get 6-12 month old DVDs for £5 on Amazon.co.uk - iTunes needs to reduce the price of older movies to stay competitive.

    I also hope that in some way it will be integrated with the iTunes Music Store - for one reason: I have loads of iTunes credit and I want to be able to spend it on movies too!

    Fingers crossed for the event today. I'm hoping for some good stuff and some common sense from Apple.





    natalie portman children. Portman will play Elizabeth
  • Portman will play Elizabeth



  • thesdx
    Jan 9, 04:33 PM
    What I want:

    - Ultra-Portable Subnotebook
    - Updated Apple TV
    - Movie Rentals
    - Mac OS X 10.5.2
    - 3G iPhone w/1.1.3
    - Official SDK





    natalie portman children. quot;No, Mr. Bond.
  • quot;No, Mr. Bond.



  • iZac
    Apr 29, 03:11 PM
    Did distracting iCal go away?

    Unfortunately both iCal and Address Book are still hideous!





    natalie portman children. Actress Natalie Portman
  • Actress Natalie Portman



  • Mac Fly (film)
    Oct 19, 11:44 AM
    I believe that translates roughly into a 1,900% return on investment.

    I could tell, my broker thought I was certifiable when I put in the buy orders. BTW, he didn't have a computer at home in those days. Now he's got an iMac. ;)
    :D :D :D





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman
  • Natalie Portman



  • SMM
    Jan 12, 09:45 AM
    you seem to of listed good reasons for why you wanted it. I had the other reaction to the phone. I personally think the interface is very poor. The touch screen only I honestly hate. Reason is because trying to type on a touch screen is a true pain. Plus it requires me looking at the phone to do it. With buttons I can do a lot of stuff with out looking. and having to look at my phone to use my speed dial would bother me. And based on the stuff that was shown it just looks like it has a lot of issues in it that would just annoy the crap out of me.

    But then again for those very same reasons I am not going to get an iPhone. Even if it only costed like 200 bucks with the contract. It is not what I want out of a phone.

    The bloody thing is not even released yet and you are already an expert? Give me a break.





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman slammed for
  • Natalie Portman slammed for



  • IJ Reilly
    Oct 20, 01:51 PM
    Oh, I dunno, perhaps acquire some more companies? You know, like TiVo - with its valuable IP - for an easy $400 million. Or pump it into R&D. Or a stake in Nintendo or Sony. Or acquire the EMI Music Group (for $1 billion) as a buffer against the other RIAA members pressuring for an increase in the iTunes Store pricing. Or finally pay off Apple Records once and for all. Those are several things Apple could do* with that $10 billion that could be more useful than artificially boosting the stock by paying out an expensive dividend to grumpy shareholders.

    Heck, maybe they could go all-solar on the Apple campus like what Google is doing.

    Of course the point is, they aren't doing these or any or things with the money. It's been accumulating steadily for nearly ten years, and is really building up quickly now. I don't think any of us "grumpy" stockholders would be complaining if Apple was doing something worthwhile with it. Dividends, BTW, are a message from a company to stockholders that they don't have to sell to realize a benefit from owning shares. They are good for improving the long term stability of the stock.





    natalie portman children. PortmanNatalie
  • PortmanNatalie



  • Dunepilot
    Nov 17, 08:09 AM
    It's the Brit pronunciation - like that extra syllable that they throw into aluminum...

    Or rather that we haven't removed a letter 'i' from that word.

    http://www.world-aluminium.org/history/language.html





    natalie portman children. NATALIE PORTMAN
  • NATALIE PORTMAN



  • Mexbearpig
    Apr 8, 10:56 PM
    Portenzo case finally came in as did my beats that I got for $80. <snip>
    http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/3117/p4080881.jpg

    How did you get beats for $80?





    natalie portman children. natalie portman children.
  • natalie portman children.



  • twoodcc
    Apr 4, 09:41 PM
    That's too bad, yeah heat is bad.

    Yeah. I guess it's heat. I have two gtx 260's going and an i7 over clocked to 3.5 ghz. But it was working great 2 months ago





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman Is Too
  • Natalie Portman Is Too



  • MorphingDragon
    Apr 29, 07:58 PM
    Context. Is. Everything.

    Context is Legion.

    All these months, and again you try to argue with me over what I meant. New Zealanders really have a problem with the concept of "I know better what I meant that you do and it was clearly posted had you followed the context".

    I thought regulars long ago learned to stop taking me seriously? All I've been doing is borderline trolling since 2010. How is "So KDE4 is a bad 90s Linux Window Manager?" not an obvious troll comment? Of course its not, its an average modern window manager.

    God you canadians are so serious about everything. ;):rolleyes:





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman slammed for
  • Natalie Portman slammed for



  • CalBoy
    Apr 15, 04:21 PM
    As I said, I understood the point you were trying to make. But.... you can't take two non-TSA incidents and use those to make a case against the TSA specifically. All you can do is say that increased security, similar to what the TSA does, can be shown to not catch everything. I could just as easily argue that because the two incidents (shoe and underwear bombers) did not occur from TSA screenings then that is proof the TSA methods work. I could, but I won't because we don't really know that is true. Too small a sample to judge.

    Well actually we know the TSA methods don't work because both of the incidents were from European airports that mirror what the TSA does. Added to the number of weapons that make it through TSA checkpoints, it's easy to see that the TSA does in fact not work to the extent that it is expected to.

    Did you not read my post above? Or did you not understand it? Or did I not write clearly? I'll assume the 3rd. Past history is that bombs are not put on planes by lone wolf fanatics. They are placed there by a whole operation involving a number of people... perhaps a dozen, maybe? The person carrying the bomb may be a brainwashed fool (though, surprisingly - often educated) - but the support team likely aren't fools. The team includes dedicated individuals who have specialized training and experience that are needed to mount further operations. The bomb makers, the money people, the people who nurture the bomb carrier and ensure that they are fit (mentally) to go through with a suicide attack. These people, the support crew, are not going to like 50/50 odds.

    I understood your rather simplistic attempt at game theory just fine. The problem remains that one side is not a rational actor. The command portion of terrorists have virtually nothing to lose with a botched attempt, and neither does the fanatic patsy. A 50/50 ratio isn't good enough for our security because the downside for both command and patsy are much smaller than the upside (from their perspective). The chances of failure need to be much higher in order to effectively deter terrorists.


    You are right. There has been a cost to dignity, time and money. Most of life is. People are constantly balancing personal and societal security/safety against personal freedoms. In this case what you think is only part of the balance between society and security. You feel it's too far. I can't argue. I don't fly anymore unless I have to. But, I also think that what the TSA (and CATSA, & the European equivalents) are doing is working. I just don't have to like going through it.

    Sacrificing these things is appropriate when there is a tangible gain. There hasn't been much of a tangible gain with TSA, and this is coming from the head of Israeli Security. We're paying a lot and getting almost nothing in return. Every year there's a new "standard" put out there to make it seem like TSA is doing something, but time and again security experts have lambasted TSA and its efforts as a dog and pony show.

    Your own opinion of flying should be an example of how ridiculous things have gotten. If people now become disgruntled and irritated every time they fly, for perhaps marginal gains in security, then our methods have failed.


    Give the man/woman/boy a cigar! There is no way to prove it, other than setting controlled experiments in which make some airports security free, and others with varying levels of security. And in some cases you don't tell the travelling public which airports have what level (if any) of security - but you do tell the bad guys/gals.

    It is difficult to prove, but you can make an educated guess about what the cause is. Other than the correlational evidence, there is no other good data to suggest that TSA has actually been effective. In no field is correlation enough to establish anything but correlation.

    I cited a sharp drop-off in hijackings at a particular moment in history. Within the limits of a Mac Rumours Forum, that is as far as I'm going to go. If you an alternative hypothesis, you have to at least back it up with something. My something trumps your alternative hypothesis - even if my something is merely a pair of deuces - until you provide something to back up your AH.

    No, that's not how it works. If you want to assert your idea as correct, the burden is on you to show that it is correct. I am going to try to poke holes in your reasoning, and it's up to you to show that my criticisms are invalid on the bases of logic and evidence.

    So far you've only cited correlation, which is not sufficient evidence for causation. You ignored my criticism based on military intervention, changing travel patterns, etc, and only want to trumpet your belief that correlation is enough. It's not. If you don't want to do more on Mac Rumors, then don't post anymore on this topic concerning this line of discussion.





    natalie portman children. natalie portman children
  • natalie portman children



  • akac
    Apr 29, 03:27 PM
    Everything and I mean *everything* is constantly being shared from these developer's builds. Check youtube. It is what it is. There are no killer features in iLion. Certainly nothing like going from Tiger to Leopard.

    Multi-User Screen Sharing is a killer feature for me. Versions is a killer feature for me. Those two alone are worth the upgrade.





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman
  • Natalie Portman



  • ranReloaded
    Mar 26, 02:28 AM
    Just by chance (I didn't realize it was OS X's birthday today), last night I wrote a blog post: '10 reasons OS X is better than Windows' (http://www.adrianoconnor.net/2011/03/10-reasons-why-mac-os-x-is-better-than-windows/). The timing seems spookily appropriate.

    You must have had a hard time picking only the top 10 out of 10,000,000 :D





    natalie portman children. Only-child Natalie Portman
  • Only-child Natalie Portman



  • OneMike
    Apr 6, 10:45 AM
    http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/3282/photoapr06114008am.jpg (http://img709.imageshack.us/i/photoapr06114008am.jpg/)

    Re-upped on my sunburst mix





    natalie portman children. Natalie Portman amp; Benjamin
  • Natalie Portman amp; Benjamin



  • Eidorian
    Nov 16, 07:58 PM
    It's quite simple. AMD bought ATI. If Apple wants to use ATI GPUs in their computer, then I guess they have to talk to AMD now (at least for pricing, orders, etc).That sounds much more likely.





    Music-Man
    Jan 9, 03:38 PM
    Can we please stop mentioning the product please. This is supposed to be a spoiler free thread.

    Thank you.





    MorphingDragon
    Apr 29, 06:53 PM
    You're mixing up your kernels. NT 4.0 doesn't share a kernel with 95/98, NT 3.51 doesn't share a kernel with Windows 3.x...

    Windows 7 is Windows 7 because it's the 7th release of Windows NT.

    1- Windows NT 3.1
    2- Windows NT 3.5
    3- Windows NT 4.0
    4- Windows 2000
    5- Windows XP
    6- Windows Vista
    7- Windows 7

    That's the only way it makes sense.

    And to think through all those Windows versions there was no significant improvement in the operating system as a whole, just specs on paper. :rolleyes:





    ktappe
    May 3, 04:56 PM
    why do they care for how you use it?Because you then sign a contract that says how you agree to use it. This is outside of that agreement. If you want to sign an agreement to use the data in a different way, I'm sure the carrier will accommodate you.
    That's not why.
    But get your wallet open.
    THAT is why.





    840quadra
    Oct 10, 09:24 PM
    I'm starting to doubt page 1 rumors just as much as I doubt Page 2 rumors. Unless you (MacRumors, not the 'source' website of the rumor,) have credible, reliable, direct sources, it belongs on Page 2. If you don't have direct sources, (as rumors on other websites would be,) it does not belong on page 1. By your own standards.



    I'm not sure where you got those criteria... but those aren't the criteria for which story make the first page.

    arn




    jonat8
    Sep 12, 08:09 AM
    I would hope that if they've closed all the stores, that they will have some new media for all the stores - otherwise it's just a really stupid decision by Apple!

    *still has fingers crossed that movies will be coming to the UK store* - it's going to be a long 4 hours until the keynote..... :p :eek:



    No comments:

    Post a Comment